Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 30
Filtrar
1.
PLoS One ; 19(3): e0300738, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38512943

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The role of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTI) is mainly based on small retrospective studies. A previous study using the 1998-2009 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) found HBOT to be associated with decreased mortality in NSTI. Given the argument of advancements in critical care, we aimed to investigate the continued role of HBOT in NSTI. METHODS: The 2012-2020 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried for NSTI admissions who received surgery. 60,481 patients between 2012-2020 were included, 600 (<1%) underwent HBOT. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included amputation, hospital length of stay, and costs. A multivariate model was constructed to account for baseline differences in groups. RESULTS: Age, gender, and comorbidities were similar between the two groups. On bivariate comparison, the HBOT group had lower mortality rate (<2% vs 5.9%, p<0.001) and lower amputation rate (11.8% vs 18.3%, p<0.001) however, longer lengths of stay (16.9 days vs 14.6 days, p<0.001) and higher costs ($54,000 vs $46,000, p<0.001). After multivariate analysis, HBOT was associated with decreased mortality (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) 0.22, 95% CI 0.09-0.53, P<0.001) and lower risk of amputation (AOR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55-0.96, P = 0.03). HBO was associated with longer stays by 1.6 days (95% CI 0.4-2.7 days) and increased costs by $7,800 (95% CI $2,200-$13,300), they also had significantly lower risks of non-home discharges (AOR 0.79, 95%CI 0.65-0.96). CONCLUSIONS: After correction for differences, HBOT was associated with decreased mortality, amputations, and non-home discharges in NSTI with the tradeoff of increase to costs and length of stay.


Assuntos
Fasciite Necrosante , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles , Humanos , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Hospitalização , Custos e Análise de Custo , Fasciite Necrosante/terapia
2.
Undersea Hyperb Med ; 50(3): 265-272, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37708059

RESUMO

Background: Electronic devices remain highly restricted from use during hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) treatment due to risk of fire in a pressurized, oxygen-rich environment. Over recent decades, point-of- care ultrasound (POCUS) has established utility in most clinical environments except hyperbaric chambers, where only heavily modified POCUS devices have been used. This study evaluated proof of concept, safety, and performance of a wireless off-the-shelf handheld POCUS device in the hyperbaric environment. Materials and Methods: The GE Vscan Air was initially tested in a Class C chamber with 100% nitrogen up to 4.0 ATA and monitored. Second, the Vscan Air was paired with an encased Apple iPad, tested previously for hyperbaric use, and both were pressurized to 2.4 ATA in a Class A chamber (21% oxygen) and evaluated. Similarly, it was then tested at 2.8 ATA and also paired wirelessly with an iPad outside the chamber. Device temperature, image quality, functionality, and wireless connection were tested continuously. Results: The GE Vscan Air automatically shut off due to power button depression during initial compression; thus the power button was punctured with an 18-gauge needle to equalize gas pressure. Thereafter, the system performed well throughout all tests without degradation in function or image quality. The device did not overheat nor reach temperatures concerning for fire hazard. Further, wireless connection to out-of-chamber devices was maintained. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the GE Vscan Air can be used with minor modification in a multi- place hyperbaric chamber. Wireless functionality allows for pairing with a screen and device outside the chamber.

3.
Pain Manag ; 13(7): 373-378, 2023 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37458263

RESUMO

The genicular nerve block (GNB) performed under ultrasound is a common procedure in the perioperative and outpatient setting for the treatment of surgical knee pain and osteoarthritis. It provides motor-sparing analgesia to the knee, making it a potential alternative to other modes of pain management in the emergency department (ED). We present an elderly woman with acute-on-chronic osteoarthritic knee pain which was relieved for a week after a GNB during her ED visit. In patients with knee pain, the ultrasound guided GNB has the potential to provide short-term analgesia for patients with pain refractory to other modes of analgesia. The GNB shows promise as a reliable contribution to a multimodal approach to pain management in the ED setting.


Assuntos
Dor Aguda , Bloqueio Nervoso , Osteoartrite do Joelho , Feminino , Humanos , Idoso , Osteoartrite do Joelho/complicações , Osteoartrite do Joelho/terapia , Joelho/inervação , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Manejo da Dor/métodos
4.
J Emerg Med ; 62(6): 760-768, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35562246

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound guidance has been shown to decrease complication rates and improve success for internal jugular and femoral vein catheterization in the emergency department (ED). However, the current data on the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided subclavian vein catheterization has failed to provide support for similar conclusions. OBJECTIVE: To determine if ultrasound-guided subclavian vein catheterization is safer and more efficacious than the traditional landmark method in an ED setting. METHODS: A prospective randomized trial was conducted from April 2004 through June 2009 in an urban tertiary care academic ED with an annual census of >50,000 patients. Four primary data endpoints were calculated: 1) overall success for both resident and attending physicians; 2) number of attempts by each group of providers; 3) complication rate with each method; and 4) time to which the subclavian line was obtained. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients were enrolled in the study. The ultrasound method was more successful in obtaining subclavian catheter placement when compared with the landmark method. When comparing successful cannulation attempts in both groups, the ultrasound group showed a statistically significant longer time to success when compared with the landmark group. There was no difference in the success or complication rates between residents and attending physicians. There was no significant difference in complications rates between ultrasound-guided and landmark methods. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided subclavian vein catheterization was found to be associated with a higher overall success rate compared with the landmark method with no significant difference with respect to complication rate in an ED setting. © 2022 Elsevier Inc.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Veia Subclávia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Humanos , Veias Jugulares/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Veia Subclávia/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos
5.
Undersea Hyperb Med ; 48(3): 221-226, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34390626

RESUMO

Historically, electronic devices have been generally prohibited during hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy due to risk of fire in a pressurized, oxygen-rich environment. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) however has emerged as a useful imaging modality in diverse clinical settings. Hyperbaric chambers treating critically ill patients would benefit from the application of POCUS at pressure to make real-time patient assessments. Thus far, POCUS during HBO2 therapy has been limited due to required equipment modifications to meet safety standards. Here we demonstrate proof of concept, safety, and successful performance of an off-the-shelf handheld POCUS system (SonoSite iViz) in a clinical hyperbaric environment without need for modification.


Assuntos
Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica , Testes Imediatos , Estudo de Prova de Conceito , Ultrassonografia/instrumentação , Cuidados Críticos , Estado Terminal , Fontes de Energia Elétrica , Desenho de Equipamento , Segurança de Equipamentos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Temperatura Alta , Humanos , Fatores de Tempo
6.
Wilderness Environ Med ; 32(3): 302-307, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34294537

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Stingray envenomations are a common marine animal injury for which it is important to identify and remove retained barbs to prevent secondary infection. The optimal imaging modality in stingray foreign body detection is not well characterized in the existing literature. In this study, we compared the accuracy of plain radiography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting stingray barbs in the human foot and ankle. METHODS: This cadaveric study included a 1:1 randomization to the presence or absence of barbs in 24 sample injuries of human cadaveric foot and ankle specimens. Physicians trained in emergency medicine and radiology performed ultrasound examinations on each specimen and interpreted the presence or absence of a barb. Participants also interpreted x-ray images in the same manner. MRI scans were separately interpreted by a musculoskeletal radiology attending. Data were analyzed using McNemar's test. RESULTS: The 19 participants included 14 (74%) trained in emergency medicine and 5 (26%) trained in radiology. Forty-seven percent were residents, 42% faculty, and 11% fellows. X-ray was associated with the highest sensitivity of 94% for the identification of a retained barb, followed by MRI (83%) and ultrasound (70%). MRI was associated with the highest specificity of 100%, followed by x-ray (98%) and ultrasound (73%). CONCLUSIONS: Retained stingray barbs can lead to secondary infection after envenomation. In human cadaveric specimens, x-ray demonstrated the highest sensitivity, MRI demonstrated the highest specificity, and ultrasound demonstrated lower sensitivity and specificity.


Assuntos
Rajidae , Animais , Cadáver , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Radiografia , Ultrassonografia
7.
Acad Emerg Med ; 28(3): 314-324, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33492755

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to provide a longitudinal assessment of anxiety levels and work and home concerns of U.S. emergency physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We performed a longitudinal, cross-sectional email survey of clinically active emergency physicians (attending, fellow, and resident) at seven academic emergency departments. Follow-up surveys were sent 4 to 6 weeks after the initial survey and assessed the following: COVID-19 patient exposure, availability of COVID-19 testing, levels of home and workplace anxiety/stress, changes in behaviors, and performance on a primary care posttraumatic stress disorder screen (PC-PTSD-5). Logistic regression explored factors associated with a high PC-PTSD-5 scale score (≥3), indicating increased risk for PTSD. RESULTS: Of the 426 surveyed initial respondents, 262 (61.5%) completed the follow-up survey. While 97.3% (255/262) reported treating suspected COVID-19 patients, most physicians (162/262, 61.8%) had not received testing themselves. In follow-up, respondents were most concerned about the relaxing of social distancing leading to a second wave (median score = 6, IQR = 4-7). Physicians reported a consistently high ability to order COVID-19 tests for patients (median score = 6, IQR = 5-7) and access to personal protective equipment (median score = 6, IQR = 5-6). Women physicians were more likely to score ≥ 3 than men on the PC-PTSD-5 screener on the initial survey (43.3% vs. 22.5%; Δ 20.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 9.3% to 31.5%), and despite decreases in overall proportions, this discrepancy remained in follow-up (34.7% vs. 16.8%; Δ 17.9%, 95% CI = 7.1% to 28.1%). In examining the relationship between demographics, living situations, and institution location on having a PC-PTSD-5 score ≥ 3, only female sex was associated with a PC-PTSD-5 score ≥ 3 (adjusted odds ratio = 2.48, 95% CI = 1.28 to 4.79). CONCLUSIONS: While exposure to suspected COVID-19 patients was nearly universal, stress levels in emergency physicians decreased with time. At both initial and follow-up assessments, women were more likely to test positive on the PC-PTSD-5 screener compared to men.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Médicos , Teste para COVID-19 , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Inquéritos e Questionários
8.
Diving Hyperb Med ; 50(4): 391-398, 2020 Dec 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33325021

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Artisanal diving fishermen in Yucatán, Mexico have high rates of decompression sickness as a result of frequently unsafe diving practices with surface supplied compressed air. In this study, we investigated the prevalence of dysbaric osteonecrosis (DON), a type of avascular necrosis, in the most susceptible joints in a cohort of these fishermen. METHODS: We performed radiographs of bilateral shoulders, hips, and knees of 39 fishermen in Mexico and surveyed them about their medical and diving histories. We performed pairwise correlations to examine if the fishermen's diving behaviours affected the numbers of joints with DON. RESULTS: The radiographs revealed Grade II or higher DON in 30/39 (76.9%) of the fishermen. Twenty-two of 39 fishermen (56.4%) had at least two affected joints. The number of joints with DON positively correlates with the lifetime maximum diving depth and average bottom time. CONCLUSIONS: These findings represent among the highest prevalence rates of DON in divers and reflect the wide-spread scale of decompression sickness among these fishermen. Through this work, we hope to further educate the fishermen on the sequelae of their diving with the aim of improving their diving safety.


Assuntos
Doença da Descompressão , Mergulho , Doenças Profissionais , Osteonecrose , Doença da Descompressão/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença da Descompressão/epidemiologia , Doença da Descompressão/etiologia , Mergulho/efeitos adversos , Humanos , México/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Osteonecrose/diagnóstico por imagem , Osteonecrose/epidemiologia , Osteonecrose/etiologia
10.
Acad Emerg Med ; 27(8): 700-707, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32569419

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to assess anxiety and burnout levels, home life changes, and measures to relieve stress of U.S. academic emergency medicine (EM) physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic acceleration phase. METHODS: We sent a cross-sectional e-mail survey to all EM physicians at seven academic emergency departments. The survey incorporated items from validated stress scales and assessed perceptions and key elements in the following domains: numbers of suspected COVID-19 patients, availability of diagnostic testing, levels of home and workplace anxiety, severity of work burnout, identification of stressors, changes in home behaviors, and measures to decrease provider anxiety. RESULTS: A total of 426 (56.7%) EM physicians responded. On a scale of 1 to 7 (1 = not at all, 4 = somewhat, and 7 = extremely), the median (interquartile range) reported effect of the pandemic on both work and home stress levels was 5 (4-6). Reported levels of emotional exhaustion/burnout increased from a prepandemic median (IQR) of 3 (2-4) to since the pandemic started a median of 4 (3-6), with a difference in medians of 1.8 (95% confidence interval = 1.7 to 1.9). Most physicians (90.8%) reported changing their behavior toward family and friends, especially by decreasing signs of affection (76.8%). The most commonly cited measures cited to alleviate stress/anxiety were increasing personal protective equipment (PPE) availability, offering rapid COVID-19 testing at physician discretion, providing clearer communication about COVID-19 protocol changes, and assuring that physicians can take leave for care of family and self. CONCLUSIONS: During the acceleration phase, the COVID-19 pandemic has induced substantial workplace and home anxiety in academic EM physicians, and their exposure during work has had a major impact on their home lives. Measures cited to decrease stress include enhanced availability of PPE, rapid turnaround testing at provider discretion, and clear communication about COVID-19 protocol changes.


Assuntos
Ansiedade/psicologia , Esgotamento Profissional/psicologia , COVID-19/psicologia , Médicos/psicologia , Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Esgotamento Profissional/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Teste para COVID-19/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Medicina de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2
11.
Ann Emerg Med ; 76(2): 143-148, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31983495

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: In the current era of frequent chest computed tomography (CT) for adult blunt trauma evaluation, many minor injuries are diagnosed, potentially rendering traditional teachings obsolete. We seek to update teachings in regard to thoracic spine fracture by determining how often such fractures are observed on CT only (ie, not visualized on preceding trauma chest radiograph), the admission rate, mortality, and hospital length of stay of thoracic spine fracture patients, and how often thoracic spine fractures are clinically significant. METHODS: This was a preplanned analysis of prospectively collected data from the NEXUS Chest CT study conducted from 2011 to 2014 at 9 Level I trauma centers. The inclusion criteria were older than 14 years, blunt trauma occurring within 6 hours of emergency department (ED) presentation, and chest imaging (radiography, CT, or both) during ED evaluation. RESULTS: Of 11,477 enrolled subjects, 217 (1.9%) had a thoracic spine fracture; 181 of the 198 thoracic spine fracture patients (91.4%) who had both chest radiograph and CT had their thoracic spine fracture observed on CT only. Half of patients (49.8%) had more than 1 level of thoracic spine fracture, with a mean of 2.1 levels (SD 1.6 levels) of thoracic spine involved. Most patients (62%) had associated thoracic injuries. Compared with patients without thoracic spine fracture, those with it had higher admission rates (88.5% versus 47.2%; difference 41.3%; 95% confidence interval 36.3% to 45%), higher mortality (6.3% versus 4.0%; difference 2.3%; 95% confidence interval 0 to 6.7%), and longer length of stay (median 9 versus 6 days; difference 3 days; P<.001). However, thoracic spine fracture patients without other thoracic injury had mortality similar to that of patients without thoracic spine fracture (4.6% versus 4%; difference 0.6%; 95% confidence interval -2.5% to 8.6%). Less than half of thoracic spine fractures (47.4%) were clinically significant: 40.8% of patients received thoracolumbosacral orthosis bracing, 10.9% had surgery, and 3.8% had an associated neurologic deficit. CONCLUSION: Thoracic spine fracture is uncommon. Most thoracic spine fractures are associated with other thoracic injuries, and mortality is more closely related to these other injuries than to the thoracic spine fracture itself. More than half of thoracic spine fractures are clinically insignificant; surgical intervention is uncommon and neurologic injury is rare.


Assuntos
Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade , Traumatismo Múltiplo/epidemiologia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/epidemiologia , Traumatismos Torácicos/epidemiologia , Vértebras Torácicas/lesões , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/epidemiologia , Acidentes por Quedas , Acidentes de Trânsito , Adulto , Idoso , Vértebras Cervicais/lesões , Clavícula/lesões , Feminino , Hemotórax/epidemiologia , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Vértebras Lombares/lesões , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Motocicletas , Pedestres , Radiografia Torácica , Fraturas das Costelas/epidemiologia , Escápula/lesões , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Vértebras Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Torácicas/cirurgia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem
12.
J Emerg Med ; 58(3): 457-463, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31843323

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is commonly used to facilitate care in the emergency department. Acquired images are often reviewed by local experts for educational and quality assurance purposes. However, no published study has examined the accuracy and reliability of POCUS image interpretation by multiple reviewers. OBJECTIVES: We studied the accuracy and interrater agreement among expert and trainee reviewers of prerecorded pediatric skin and soft tissue (SST) POCUS images. METHODS: POCUS faculty and emergency medicine (EM) residents blindly reviewed deidentified pediatric SST POCUS images and indicated whether a drainable fluid collection was present, absent, or indeterminate. This was then compared with the gold standard based on discharge diagnoses and telephone follow-up. Images rated as indeterminate were excluded from the initial analysis. Sensitivity analysis assuming indeterminate answers were inaccurate was subsequently conducted. RESULTS: In phase 1, 6 pediatric EM POCUS directors reviewed 168 images. The overall accuracy was 79.7% (range 66.1-86.0%). The mean Cohen's kappa was 0.58 (range 0.24-0.84). Sensitivity analysis yielded an overall accuracy of 71.3% (range 56.5-76.9%) and a Cohen's kappa of 0.43 (range 0.20-0.59). In phase 2, 6 general EM POCUS faculty and 20 EM residents reviewed 120 images. The overall accuracy among residents was 72.2% (range 51.4-84.7%) and among faculty was 83.6% (range 77.9-88.8%). Sensitivity analysis yielded an overall resident accuracy of 63.0% (range 49.5-80.7) and an overall faculty accuracy of 73.9% (range 67.0-79.8%). Fleiss' kappa was 0.322 for residents and 0.461 for faculty. CONCLUSIONS: We found moderate accuracy and fair to good interrater agreement among POCUS faculty and EM residents reviewing pediatric SST POCUS images.


Assuntos
Medicina de Emergência , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Pele/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia , Criança , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Docentes , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
13.
Acad Emerg Med ; 27(4): 291-296, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31811732

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In the era of frequent head-to-pelvis computed tomography (CT) for adult blunt trauma evaluation, we sought to update teachings regarding aortic injury by determining 1) the incidence of aortic injury; 2) the proportion of patients with isolated aortic injury (without other concomitant thoracic injury); 3) the clinical implications of aortic injury (hospital mortality, length of stay [LOS], and rate of surgical interventions); and 4) the screening value of traditional risk factors/markers (such as high-energy mechanism and widened mediastinum on chest x-ray [CXR]) for aortic injury, compared to newer criteria from the recently developed NEXUS Chest CT decision instrument (DI). METHODS: We conducted a preplanned analysis of patients prospectively enrolled in the NEXUS Chest studies at 10 Level I trauma centers with the following inclusion criteria: age > 14 years, blunt trauma within 6 hours of ED presentation, and receiving chest imaging during ED trauma evaluation. RESULTS: Of 24,010 enrolled subjects, 42 (0.17%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.13% to 0.24%) had aortic injury. Most patients (79%, 95% CI = 64% to 88%) had an associated thoracic injury, with rib fractures, pneumothorax/hemothorax, and pulmonary contusion occurring most frequently. Compared to patients without aortic injury this cohort had similar mortality (9.5%, 95% CI = 3.8% to 22.1% vs. 5.8%, 95% CI = 5.4% to 6.3%), longer median hospital LOS (11 days vs. 3 days, p < 0.01), and higher median Injury Severity Score (29 vs. 5, p < 0.001). High-energy mechanism and widened mediastinum on CXR had low sensitivity for aortic injury (76% [95% CI = 62% to 87%] and 33% [95% CI = 21% to 49%], respectively), compared to the NEXUS Chest CT DI (sensitivity 100% [95% CI = 92% to 100%]). CONCLUSIONS: Aortic injury is rare in adult ED blunt trauma patients who survive to receive imaging. Most ED aortic injury patients have associated thoracic injuries and survive to hospital discharge. Widened mediastinum on CXR and high-energy mechanism have relatively low screening sensitivity for aortic injury, but the NEXUS Chest DI detected all cases.


Assuntos
Aorta/lesões , Traumatismos Torácicos/epidemiologia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Aorta/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Incidência , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Centros de Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Imagem Corporal Total , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem
14.
Ann Emerg Med ; 73(1): 58-65, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30287121

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Although traditional teachings in regard to pneumothorax and hemothorax generally recommend chest tube placement and hospital admission, the increasing use of chest computed tomography (CT) in blunt trauma evaluation may detect more minor pneumothorax and hemothorax that might indicate a need to modify these traditional practices. We determine the incidence of pneumothorax and hemothorax observed on CT only and the incidence of isolated pneumothorax and hemothorax (pneumothorax and hemothorax occurring without other thoracic injuries), and describe the clinical implications of these injuries. METHODS: This was a planned secondary analysis of 2 prospective, observational studies of adult patients with blunt trauma, NEXUS Chest (January 2009 to December 2012) and NEXUS Chest CT (August 2011 to May 2014), set in 10 Level I US trauma centers. Participants' inclusion criteria were older than 14 years, presentation to the emergency department (ED) within 6 hours of blunt trauma, and receipt of chest imaging (chest radiograph, chest CT, or both) during their ED evaluation. Exposure(s) (for observational studies) were that patients had trauma and chest imaging. Primary measures and outcomes included the incidence of pneumothorax and hemothorax observed on CT only versus on both chest radiograph and chest CT, the incidence of isolated pneumothorax and hemothorax (pneumothorax and hemothorax occurring without other thoracic injuries), and admission rates, hospital length of stay, mortality, and frequency of chest tube placement for these injuries. RESULTS: Of 21,382 enrolled subjects, 1,064 (5%) had a pneumothorax and 384 (1.8%) had a hemothorax. Of the 8,661 patients who received both a chest radiograph and a chest CT, 910 (10.5%) had a pneumothorax, with 609 (67%) observed on CT only; 319 (3.7%) had a hemothorax, with 254 (80%) observed on CT only. Of 1,117 patients with pneumothorax, hemothorax, or both, 108 (10%) had isolated pneumothorax or hemothorax. Patients with pneumothorax observed on CT only had a lower chest tube placement rate (30% versus 65%; difference in proportions [Δ] -35%; 95% confidence interval [CI] -28% to 42%), admission rate (94% versus 99%; Δ 5%; 95% CI 3% to 8%), and median length of stay (5 versus 6 days; difference 1 day; 95% CI 0 to 2 days) but similar mortality compared with patients with pneumothorax observed on chest radiograph and CT. Patients with hemothorax observed on CT had only a lower chest tube placement rate (49% versus 68%; Δ -19%; 95% CI -31% to -5%) but similar admission rate, mortality, and median length of stay compared with patients with hemothorax observed on chest radiograph and CT. Compared with patients with other thoracic injury, those with isolated pneumothorax or hemothorax had a lower chest tube placement rate (20% versus 43%; Δ -22%; 95% CI -30% to -13%), median length of stay (4 versus 5 days; difference -1 day; 95% CI -3 to 1 days), and admission rate (44% versus 97%; Δ -53%; 95% CI -62% to -43%), with an admission rate comparable to that of patients without pneumothorax or hemothorax (49%). CONCLUSION: Under current imaging protocols for adult blunt trauma evaluation, most pneumothoraces and hemothoraces are observed on CT only and few occur as isolated thoracic injury. The clinical implications (admission rates and frequency of chest tube placement) of pneumothorax and hemothorax observed on CT only and isolated pneumothorax or hemothorax are lower than those of patients with pneumothorax and hemothorax observed on chest radiograph and CT and of those who have other thoracic injury, respectively.


Assuntos
Hemotórax/epidemiologia , Pneumotórax/epidemiologia , Traumatismos Torácicos/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Feminino , Hemotórax/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Incidência , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Pneumotórax/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
15.
Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med ; 2(3): 244-246, 2018 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30083643

RESUMO

A spontaneous diaphragmatic hernia (SDH) occurs when intra-abdominal contents extend into the thoracic cavity through a defect in the diaphragm after a sudden increase in intra-abdominal pressure. SDH is one of the rarest surgical emergencies with less than 30 reported cases in the literature.1,2 In our case a 94-year-old female presented to the emergency department in respiratory distress with unilateral breath sounds and was diagnosed with a SDH. The only treatment option for a SDH is surgical.3,11 However, nasogastric tube decompression of the gastrointestinal tract and supplemental oxygen can be used to alleviate symptoms until definitive operative management is performed.

16.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 34(2): 145-148, 2018 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29346232

RESUMO

The presentation of a pediatric patient to the emergency department for a malfunctioning or dislodged gastrostomy tube (G-tube) is not uncommon. As such, these tubes are often replaced at the bedside. Improper placement can result in a number of complications, including perforation, fistula tract formation, peritonitis, and sepsis. The current criterion standard method to confirm proper G-tube placement is contrast-enhanced radiography. However, point-of-care ultrasound may be an alternative method to guide and confirm pediatric G-tube replacement in the emergency department. We report a series of cases on this novel point-of-care ultrasound application.


Assuntos
Remoção de Dispositivo/métodos , Nutrição Enteral/métodos , Gastrostomia/métodos , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Remoção de Dispositivo/efeitos adversos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Nutrição Enteral/efeitos adversos , Falha de Equipamento , Feminino , Gastrostomia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Reoperação
17.
Ann Emerg Med ; 70(6): 904-909, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28559032

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: With increased use of chest computed tomography (CT) in trauma evaluation, traditional teachings in regard to rib fracture morbidity and mortality may no longer be accurate. We seek to determine rates of rib fracture observed on chest CT only; admission and mortality of patients with isolated rib fractures, rib fractures observed on CT only, and first or second rib fractures; and first or second rib fracture-associated great vessel injury. METHODS: We conducted a planned secondary analysis of 2 prospectively enrolled cohorts of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study chest studies, which evaluated patients with blunt trauma who were older than 14 years and received chest imaging in the emergency department. We defined rib fractures and other thoracic injuries according to CT reports and followed patients through their hospital course to determine outcomes. RESULTS: Of 8,661 patients who had both chest radiograph and chest CT, 2,071 (23.9%) had rib fractures, and rib fractures were observed on chest CT only in 1,368 cases (66.1%). Rib fracture patients had higher admission rates (88.7% versus 45.8%; mean difference 42.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 41.4% to 44.4%) and mortality (5.6% versus 2.7%; mean difference 2.9%; 95% CI 1.8% to 4.0%) than patients without rib fracture. The mortality of patients with rib fracture observed on chest CT only was not statistically significantly different from that of patients with fractures also observed on chest radiograph (4.8% versus 5.7%; mean difference -0.9%; 95% CI -3.1% to 1.1%). Patients with first or second rib fractures had significantly higher mortality (7.4% versus 4.1%; mean difference 3.3%; 95% CI 0.2% to 7.1%) and prevalence of concomitant great vessel injury (2.8% versus 0.6%; mean difference 2.2%; 95% CI 0.6% to 4.9%) than patients with fractures of ribs 3 to 12, and the odds ratio of great vessel injury with first or second rib fracture was 4.4 (95% CI 1.8 to 10.4). CONCLUSION: Under trauma imaging protocols that commonly incorporate chest CT, two thirds of rib fractures were observed on chest CT only. Patients with rib fractures had higher admission rates and mortality than those without rib fractures. First or second rib fractures were associated with significantly higher mortality and great vessel injury.


Assuntos
Fraturas das Costelas/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Idoso , Aorta/diagnóstico por imagem , Aorta/lesões , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radiografia Torácica , Fraturas das Costelas/diagnóstico , Fraturas das Costelas/mortalidade , Tórax/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem
18.
Acad Emerg Med ; 23(8): 863-9, 2016 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27163732

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The use of chest computed tomography (CT) to evaluate emergency department patients with adult blunt trauma is rising. The NEXUS Chest CT decision instruments are highly sensitive identifiers of adult blunt trauma patients with thoracic injuries. However, many patients without injury exhibit one of more of the criteria so cannot be classified "low risk." We sought to determine screening performance of both individual and combined NEXUS Chest CT criteria as predictors of thoracic injury to inform chest CT imaging decisions in "non-low-risk" patients. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of data on patients in the derivation and validation cohorts of the prospective, observational NEXUS Chest CT study, performed September 2011 to May 2014 in 11 Level I trauma centers. Institutional review board approval was obtained at all study sites. Adult blunt trauma patients receiving chest CT were included. The primary outcome was injury and major clinical injury prevalence and screening performance in patients with combinations of one, two, or three of seven individual NEXUS Chest CT criteria. RESULTS: Across the 11 study sites, rates of chest CT performance ranged from 15.5% to 77.2% (median = 43.6%). We found injuries in 1,493/5,169 patients (28.9%) who had chest CT; 269 patients (5.2%) had major clinical injury (e.g., pneumothorax requiring chest tube). With sensitivity of 73.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 68.1 to 78.6) and specificity of 83.9 (95% CI = 83.6 to 84.2) for major clinical injury, abnormal chest-x-ray (CXR) was the single most important screening criterion. When patients had only abnormal CXR, injury and major clinical injury prevalences were 60.7% (95% CI = 52.2% to 68.6%) and 12.9% (95% CI = 8.3% to 19.4%), respectively. Injury and major clinical injury prevalences when any other single criterion alone (other than abnormal CXR) was present were 16.8% (95% CI = 15.2% to 18.6%) and 1.1% (95% CI = 0.1% to 1.8%), respectively. Injury and major clinical injury prevalences among patients when two and three criteria (not abnormal CXR) were present were 25.5% (95% CI = 23.1% to 28.0%) and 3.2% (95% CI = 2.3% to 4.4%) and 34.9% (95% CI = 31.0% to 39.0%) and 2.7% (95% CI = 1.6% to 4.5%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that clinicians check for the six clinical NEXUS Chest CT criteria and review the CXR (if obtained). If patients have one clinical criterion (other than abnormal CXR), they will have a very low risk of clinically major injury. We recommend that clinicians discuss the potential risks and benefit of chest CT in these cases. The risks of injury and major clinical injury rise incrementally with more criteria, rendering the risk/benefit ratio toward performing CT in most cases. If the patient has an abnormal CXR, the risks of major clinical injury and minor injury are considerably higher than with the other criteria-chest CT may be indicated in cases requiring greater anatomic detail and injury characterization.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Radiografia Torácica/instrumentação , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/normas , Adulto , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumotórax , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Traumatismos Torácicos/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos Torácicos/epidemiologia , Centros de Traumatologia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem
19.
J Ultrasound Med ; 35(2): 221-33, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26764278

RESUMO

Since the first medical student ultrasound electives became available more than a decade ago, ultrasound in undergraduate medical education has gained increasing popularity. More than a dozen medical schools have fully integrated ultrasound education in their curricula, with several dozen more institutions planning to follow suit. Starting in June 2012, a working group of emergency ultrasound faculty at the California medical schools began to meet to discuss barriers as well as innovative approaches to implementing ultrasound education in undergraduate medical education. It became clear that an ongoing collaborative could be formed to discuss barriers, exchange ideas, and lend support for this initiative. The group, termed Ultrasound in Medical Education, California (UMeCali), was formed with 2 main goals: to exchange ideas and resources in facilitating ultrasound education and to develop a white paper to discuss our experiences. Five common themes integral to successful ultrasound education in undergraduate medical education are discussed in this article: (1) initiating an ultrasound education program; (2) the role of medical student involvement; (3) integration of ultrasound in the preclinical years; (4) developing longitudinal ultrasound education; and (5) addressing competency.


Assuntos
Currículo , Educação de Graduação em Medicina , Ultrassonografia , California , Competência Clínica , Faculdades de Medicina , Inquéritos e Questionários
20.
Ann Emerg Med ; 68(2): 222-6, 2016 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26607334

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The NEXUS chest decision instrument identifies a very-low-risk population of patients with blunt trauma for whom chest imaging can be avoided. However, it requires that all 7 National Emergency X-Ray Utilization Study (NEXUS) chest criteria be absent. To inform patient and physician shared decisionmaking about imaging, we describe the test characteristics of individual criteria of the NEXUS chest decision instrument and provide the prevalence of injuries when 1, 2, or 3 of the 7 criteria are present. METHODS: We conducted this secondary analysis of 2 prospectively collected cohorts of patients with blunt trauma who were older than 14 years and enrolled in NEXUS chest studies between December 2009 and January 2012. Physicians at 9 US Level I trauma centers recorded the presence or absence of the 7 NEXUS chest criteria. We calculated test characteristics of each criterion and combinations of criteria for the outcome measures of major clinical injuries and thoracic injury observed on chest imaging. RESULTS: We enrolled 21,382 patients, of whom 992 (4.6%) had major clinical injuries and 3,135 (14.7%) had thoracic injuries observed on chest imaging. Sensitivities of individual test characteristics ranged from 15% to 56% for major clinical injury and 14% to 53% for thoracic injury observed on chest imaging, with specificities varying from 71% to 84% for major clinical injury and 67% to 84% for thoracic injury observed on chest imaging. Individual criteria were associated with a prevalence of major clinical injury between 1.9% and 3.8% and of thoracic injury observed on chest imaging between 5.3% and 11.5%. CONCLUSION: Patients with isolated NEXUS chest criteria have low rates of major clinical injury. The risk of major clinical injury for patients with 2 or 3 factors range from 1.7% to 16.6%, depending on the combination of criteria. Criteria-specific risks could be used to inform shared decisionmaking about the need for imaging by patients and their physicians.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Radiografia Torácica , Traumatismos Torácicos/diagnóstico por imagem , Índices de Gravidade do Trauma , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Traumatismos Torácicos/classificação , Traumatismos Torácicos/epidemiologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/classificação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...